[8WashJLTech&Arts0079] Whose Invention Is It Anyway? Employee Invention-Assignment Agreements and Their Limits

digital.law/Manakin Repository

[8WashJLTech&Arts0079] Whose Invention Is It Anyway? Employee Invention-Assignment Agreements and Their Limits

Show full item record

Title: [8WashJLTech&Arts0079] Whose Invention Is It Anyway? Employee Invention-Assignment Agreements and Their Limits
Author: Howell, Parker; Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts
Abstract: Abstract: Pre-invention assignment provisions have become important and commonplace facets of employment agreements, supplanting common law rules for invention ownership. Yet statutes in seven states—including California, Washington, and Minnesota—restrict invention assignment. These statutes make agreements unenforceable when a worker invents on his or her own time without use of employer resources and the invention does not relate to the employer’s business or the employee’s work. Employers should be ready to argue why a given invention is not excluded from assignment by statute, although judicial decisions suggest many disputed inventions nonetheless belong to the employer. Statutory arguments notwithstanding, employee-inventors may challenge the validity of assignment agreements based on ambiguity in the contractual language. The defendant in a high-profile case over ownership of the Bratz line of fashion dolls, Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment, Inc., prevailed on such an argument. This Article examines the limits on contractual pre-invention assignment, using the Mattel litigation as a case study.
Description: Washington Journal of Law, Technology & Arts, volume 8, Issue 2, Fall 2012
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/1169
Date: 2012-11

Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
8wjlta79.pdf 196.5Kb PDF View/Open Parker

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

Search digital.law


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account