Assessing the Accuracy of Provider Profiling Methods for Classification

ResearchWorks/Manakin Repository

Search ResearchWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

Related Information

Assessing the Accuracy of Provider Profiling Methods for Classification

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor Hubbard, Rebecca A en_US
dc.contributor.author Ding, Victoria en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-09-13T17:33:16Z
dc.date.available 2012-09-13T17:33:16Z
dc.date.issued 2012-09-13
dc.date.submitted 2012 en_US
dc.identifier.other Ding_washington_0250O_10054.pdf en_US
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1773/20754
dc.description Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2012 en_US
dc.description.abstract Provider profiling as a means to describe and compare performance of health care professionals has gained great momentum in the past decade. The implications of profiling, which can drive provider incentives and guide health policy, call for precise and accurate statistical methods. We used a simulation study to compare the performance of three commonly used methods for estimating provider performance (ranking) and for identifying high performing providers (classifying). We evaluated classification performance based on sensitivity and specificity and ranking performance based on mean squared error. We found that when between-provider variability in performance was low, all three methods performed poorly, with low accuracy for identifying top performers and high mean squared error for ranking. We then demonstrated the performance of these methods in an application to data on satisfaction with mental health care providers. Based on these findings, we caution against the use of any classification method in the setting of low between-provider variability and recommend the use of risk-adjusted methods, which take into account variation in characteristics of providers' patients, when the ratio of between-provider variability to within-provider variability is high. en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.subject Bayesian estimation; case-mix adjustment; Monte Carlo methods; provider profiling; random effects model; variance components en_US
dc.subject.other Biostatistics en_US
dc.subject.other Biostatistics en_US
dc.title Assessing the Accuracy of Provider Profiling Methods for Classification en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.embargo.terms No embargo en_US


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Ding_washington_0250O_10054.pdf 294.7Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record