The Significance of Unintentional Omission: Moral Responsibility for the Failure to Act

ResearchWorks/Manakin Repository

Search ResearchWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

Related Information

The Significance of Unintentional Omission: Moral Responsibility for the Failure to Act

Show full item record

Title: The Significance of Unintentional Omission: Moral Responsibility for the Failure to Act
Author: Benchimol, Jason
Abstract: Many people, if asked, would probably say that we are morally responsible only for actions we voluntarily and intentionally choose to perform. But the phenomenon of unintentional omission poses a special problem for this view about the preconditions of moral responsibility. Imagine a lifeguard who carelessly fell asleep while on duty and, as a result, failed (unintentionally) to assist a struggling swimmer as she should have. It seems that what the lifeguard is morally responsible for in this circumstance is not an intentionally chosen action, but an unintentional omission. I argue that unintentional omissions like these can at least sometimes be understood to reflect an agent's judgments about the significance of normative reasons. This is all that is required for an agent to be morally responsible for an unintentional omission. My argument helps to explain why the view that we are morally responsible only for actions we voluntarily and intentionally choose to perform is mistaken.
Description: Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2012
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1773/20887
Author requested restriction: No embargo

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Benchimol_washington_0250E_10249.pdf 1002.Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record