ResearchWorks Archive

Breaching protocol: caciquismo and administrative capacity in rural Mexico

Show simple item record Pallais, Diana Margarita en_US 2009-10-07T02:29:05Z 2009-10-07T02:29:05Z 1999 en_US
dc.identifier.other b43879214 en_US
dc.identifier.other 43941349 en_US
dc.identifier.other Thesis 48698 en_US
dc.description Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 1999 en_US
dc.description.abstract This study explores the internal struggles of the upper ranks of the political elite in the wake of the neoliberal economic reforms in Mexico. Since, until recently, the PRI had a monopoly over the political system, the party's internal squabbles were tantamount to an intra-institutional crisis. The competing currents can be characterized as (a) an agendasetting, technocratic elite in control of the presidency and national leadership positions, and (b) a more traditional set of politicos, known as caciques in the countryside, who remain in charge of local institutions in remote states. The technocrats pushed for market liberalization, accelerated deregulation, and leaner public budgets. The caciques resisted the reforms, because the regulatory and budgetary largesse of the statist era was the key to their political modus operandi.In the statist era, Caciques understood their primary role in politics to be the dispensation of patronage---and largesse facilitated the nurturing of these networks. They enjoyed great discretion in the implementation of federal programs and in the regulatory ambit. In contrast, the neoliberal reforms threatened to starve caciques of patronage opportunities since government intervention is selective, public benefits are targeted at particular constituencies, and the president wants to enhance administrative capacity and accountability.This intra-institutional struggle has important consequences for the PRI's continued incumbency. As electoral competition became fiercer, the technocratic wing of the PRI made bold overtures to solidify the party's electoral ties to its most loyal constituencies. The corn growers were one such group, but they required a special effort because the PRI-sponsored NAFTA reforms injured their sectoral interests. To make amends, the technocrats introduced Procampo, a policy of direct cash transfers to corn growers. But the implementation of the policy has been varied by region. In areas where caciques have a historic advantage, they obstructed its implementation and electoral volatility ensued. I propose a model of geographic isolation to explain the Mexican state's regionally-varied institutional capacity. The technocrats sought to promote institutional checks in the implementation of Procampo, and the caciques resisted this attempt to wrest their administrative discretion. Isolation gave caciques a formidable advantage. en_US
dc.format.extent vi, 213 p. en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.rights Copyright is held by the individual authors. en_US
dc.rights.uri For information on access and permissions, please see en_US
dc.subject.other Theses--Political science en_US
dc.title Breaching protocol: caciquismo and administrative capacity in rural Mexico en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ResearchWorks

Advanced Search


My Account