Application of affymetrix array and massively parallel signature sequencing for identification of genes involved in prostate cancer progression

ResearchWorks/Manakin Repository

Search ResearchWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

Related Information

Application of affymetrix array and massively parallel signature sequencing for identification of genes involved in prostate cancer progression

Show full item record

Title: Application of affymetrix array and massively parallel signature sequencing for identification of genes involved in prostate cancer progression
Author: Oudes, Asa J.; Roach, Jared C.; Walashek, Laura S.; Eichner, Lillian J..; True, Lawrence D.; Vessella, Robert L.; Liu, Alvin Y.
Abstract: Background: Affymetrix GeneChip Array and Massively Parallel Signature Sequencing (MPSS) are two high throughput methodologies used to profile transcriptomes. Each method has certain strengths and weaknesses; however, no comparison has been made between the data derived from Affymetrix arrays and MPSS. In this study, two lineage-related prostate cancer cell lines, LNCaP and C4-2, were used for transcriptome analysis with the aim of identifying genes associated with prostate cancer progression. Methods: Affymetrix GeneChip array and MPSS analyses were performed. Data was analyzed with GeneSpring 6.2 and in-house perl scripts. Expression array results were verified with RT-PCR. Results: Comparison of the data revealed that both technologies detected genes the other did not. In LNCaP, 3,180 genes were only detected by Affymetrix and 1,169 genes were only detected by MPSS. Similarly, in C4-2, 4,121 genes were only detected by Affymetrix and 1,014 genes were only detected by MPSS. Analysis of the combined transcriptomes identified 66 genes unique to LNCaP cells and 33 genes unique to C4-2 cells. Expression analysis of these genes in prostate cancer specimens showed CA1 to be highly expressed in bone metastasis but not expressed in primary tumor and EPHA7 to be expressed in normal prostate and primary tumor but not bone metastasis. Conclusion: Our data indicates that transcriptome profiling with a single methodology will not fully assess the expression of all genes in a cell line. A combination of transcription profiling technologies such as DNA array and MPSS provides a more robust means to assess the expression profile of an RNA sample. Finally, genes that were differentially expressed in cell lines were also differentially expressed in primary prostate cancer and its metastases.
URI: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/5/86
http://hdl.handle.net/1773/15859

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
1471-2407-5-86.pdf 968.1Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record