Criticisms and Revisions to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Principles and Guidelines for Benefit-Cost Analysis (Part 2)

ResearchWorks/Manakin Repository

Search ResearchWorks


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account

Statistics

Related Information

Criticisms and Revisions to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Principles and Guidelines for Benefit-Cost Analysis (Part 2)

Show full item record

Title: Criticisms and Revisions to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Principles and Guidelines for Benefit-Cost Analysis (Part 2)
Author: Davis, Tyler Blake
Abstract: Managing water resources for flood damage protection, irrigation, reliable navigation on riverways, and other services is an important function of federal water resource agencies. To determine whether programs are implemented, federal agencies are required to systematically analyze the associated costs and benefits when evaluating the merits of a proposed project. Currently, Principles and Guidelines (P&G), established in 1983, guide federal agencies when conducting cost benefit analysis of water related projects. Our combined talks identify existing criticisms and opportunities for improving the P&Gs relating to a U.S. Army Corps project that assesses the value of levee construction for flood control on the upper Mississippi River.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1773/16527

Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
davisaudio.mp3 23.94Mb Unknown View/Open audio recording of the talk
Davis.pdf 3.245Mb PDF View/Open slide presentation accompanying the talk

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record