Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGinorio, Angela Ben_US
dc.contributor.authorDiaz, Sara P.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-09-13T17:20:38Z
dc.date.available2015-12-14T17:55:51Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-13
dc.date.submitted2012en_US
dc.identifier.otherDiaz_washington_0250E_10667.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/20506
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2012en_US
dc.description.abstractGender, Race, and Science: A <italic>Feminista</italic> Analysis of Women of Color in Science is a methodological intervention that expands the boundaries of Feminist Science Studies to include the experiences of women of color scientists and to continue the resistance against persistent racialized gender ideologies within the field. In this dissertation, I propose a revision of the field I call "<italic>Feminista</italic> Science Studies." In the introduction, I map out a methodology which integrates decolonial historical case study methodology, feminist cultural and spatial studies, and US Third World feminist theories. I then apply my <italic>Feminista</italic> analytic to three cases. In each case, I use María Lugones' theory of fragmentation, multiplicity, and curdling to analyze the relationship between the socially marked bodies of women of color scientists to the epistemological paradigms in which they worked. The first case, on zoologist Roger Arliner Young (1899-1964), uses intersectionality and queer of color theory to push beyond the single-axis accounts by situating Young's individual experience in the context of the US Eugenics movement and Jim Crow segregation. In the second case, I argue that physicist Chien-Shiung Wu's (1912-1997) research threatened foundational values within Modern Science and, magnified by Cold War era anxieties, her exoticized Asian female body was perceived as disruptive to the militarized space of the nuclear laboratory. In my third case, I use border theory to analyze how Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz (1648-1695) laid claim to the right to produce knowledge about nature, as a woman, by articulating an epistemology of mestizaje. In the conclusion, I make three claims based on these cases: 1) Women of color are positioned in opposition to modern Western science through the association of their bodies with a primitive and wild form of nature in our cultural scientific imaginary. 2) The strategies employed by these women of color for survival and success in science represent a form of oppositional differential consciousness in the service of scientific knowledge production. 3) The epistemological paradigms in which these women operated shape their experience by regulating their ability to conform and resist the social norms of science.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the individual authors.en_US
dc.subjectChien-Shiung Wu; feminism; Roger Arliner Young; science studies; Sor Juana Ines de la Cruz; women of coloren_US
dc.subject.otherWomen's studiesen_US
dc.subject.otherHistory of scienceen_US
dc.subject.otherEthnic studiesen_US
dc.subject.otherGender, women, and sexualityen_US
dc.titleGender, Race, and Science: A Feminista Analysis of Women of Color in Scienceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.embargo.termsDelay release for 2 years -- then make Open Accessen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record