ResearchWorks Archive

Ideally Reality: Alignment of Deaccession Policy and Emerging Practice in History Museums

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisor O'Donnell, Wilson en_US de Vitis, Tomasina Maria en_US 2012-09-13T17:25:36Z 2012-09-13T17:25:36Z 2012-09-13 2012 en_US
dc.identifier.other deVitis_washington_0250O_10168.pdf en_US
dc.description Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2012 en_US
dc.description.abstract Deaccessioning artifacts from museums has become a widely accepted practice as a tool for responsible and sustainable collections management. Standard deaccession policies have been developed to govern the ethical practices, and are valuable tools for accountability. However, there is a lack of research into practical application of deaccession policies in museums. This study is designed to explore the alignment of current best practices found in policies with the emerging application within history museums. The research relies on the analysis of written policies from museums and discussions regarding their deaccession projects for consistencies, and the prevalent practices as they coincide with the policies. The purpose of this study is to determine which parts of the ideal process of deaccessioning represented by policy are manifest when applied to the wide variety of material found in history museum collections. Nine museums from across the country were selected to participate in the study. Eight submitted a copy of the deaccession policy used in their institution, and staff from each museum participated in a semi-structured interview to discuss their deaccessioning practices. The results of this research show that although transferring objects is the advocated preference for the majority of museums, in practice the disposal methods chosen rely heavily on the object's physical and historical integrity. While the objects with strong documentation and good physical condition are often transferred, the majority of deaccessioned objects are found lacking in significance and disposed of through sales. This seems to support the need for further understanding of the links between deaccession criteria and disposal method as a valuable area to address accountability. en_US
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en_US
dc.language.iso en_US en_US
dc.rights Copyright is held by the individual authors. en_US
dc.subject Deaccession; Disposal en_US
dc.subject.other Museum studies en_US
dc.subject.other Museology en_US
dc.title Ideally Reality: Alignment of Deaccession Policy and Emerging Practice in History Museums en_US
dc.type Thesis en_US
dc.embargo.terms No embargo en_US

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search ResearchWorks

Advanced Search


My Account