Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMaynard, Lisa
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-28T20:48:42Z
dc.date.available2016-06-28T20:48:42Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/36309
dc.description.abstractIn 2013, the Government of Nicaragua approved the concession for a 173-mile canal to the Hong Kong Nicaragua Canal Development Investment Group. As the Western Hemisphere's second poorest nation, Nicaragua is attracted the promises of economic growth that may come as a result of the Canal Project. However, potential economic benefits may be offset by environmental and social damages that would likely occur as a result of the project. The Canal would bisect 16 watersheds, 15 protected areas, and 25 percent of Nicaragua’s rainforest, which would have high impacts on biodiversity, watershed services, and indigenous communities. In 1996, Law No. 217 was enacted to standardize the use and conservation of the environment and natural resources of Nicaragua. My research compares the Environmental and Social Impact Assessment of the Nicaragua Canal to the Environmental provisions of Law No. 217. This analysis can help understand the legal viability of the ESIA under Nicaragua environmental laws.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleThe Nicaragua Canal. Is the Assessment in line with National Environmental Law?en_US
dc.embargo.termsNo embargoen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record