Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSawers, Kimberly Men_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-06T22:32:36Z
dc.date.available2009-10-06T22:32:36Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.otherb49059300en_US
dc.identifier.other51866381en_US
dc.identifier.otherThesis 51916en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/8746
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 2002en_US
dc.description.abstractManagers often delay making decisions when decision tools indicate a preferred alternative. This avoidance behavior is costly. I posit this tendency to delay arises from the conflict inherent in choice and the manager's resulting negative affect. In this study I examine two dimensions of choice difficulty which cause conflict and are posited to increase negative affect and, as a result, increase the tendency of individuals to avoid action. Specifically, I investigate the influence of (1) tradeoffs of difficult-to-compare features and (2) tradeoffs of highly valued goals on an individual's tendency to avoid choice when analysis indicates action would be appropriate. In an experiment with one hundred twenty executives, participants with either difficult-to-compare features or difficult tradeoffs report higher levels of decision difficulty, negative affect and desire to postpone than participants in a control group. In addition, I investigate the efficacy of two potential remedies.en_US
dc.format.extentv, 81 p.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the individual authors.en_US
dc.rights.urien_US
dc.subject.otherTheses--Business administrationen_US
dc.titleChoice avoidance in managerial accounting decisionsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record