Review of the TFW Monitoring Program: Watershed-Scale Monitoring Pilot Project (Draft) (Schuett-Hames, 1999)
Loading...
Date
Authors
Sibley, Thomas
Bolton, Susan
Conquest, Loveday
Edwards, Rick
Fox, Martin J.
Gove, Nancy
Mode, Nicolle
Montgomery, David R.
O'Neal, Jennifer
Scholz, Jenna
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Washington Water Center
Abstract
Forested landscapes in Washington State are managed by a state forest practice management
system that includes Washington forest practice rules, Watershed Analyses and landowner
landscape plans. One objective of the management system is to protect aquatic resources and the
forest practice rules are currently being changed to increase protection. Monitoring at the
watershed scale is proposed as an essential requirement to evaluate the effectiveness of the new forest practices. The Center for Streamside Studies initially responded to a Request for
Proposals from the Timber-Fish-Wildlife (TFW) Effectiveness Monitoring and Evaluation Program to provide a
Conceptual Framework, Design Process and Program Standards for Watershed Effectiveness
Monitoring. After initial discussions it was decided that an appropriate initial step was to
provide a review of the document entitled "TFW Monitoring Program Watershed-Scale
Monitoring Pilot Project" (Schuett-Hames 1999).
Development of appropriate effectiveness monitoring programs at the watershed scale is an
extremely difficult and ultimately controversial task. Previous efforts generally have emphasized
specific activities or effects with few attempts to monitor cumulative effects in a statistically
sound and defensible manner. The TFW Monitoring Program proposes to assess cumulative
effects by: 1) Monitoring changes in selective input processes: Mass Wasting, Surface Erosion, Riparian LWD Recruitment, Thermal Energy and Hydrology and 2) Evaluating the response of
aquatic resources to changes in input processes. This is an appropriate structure for framing the
questions, although quantifying changes in input processes and responses by aquatic resources
will be difficult.
Specific questions and hypothesis presented in Schuett-Hames (1999) for individual inputs and responses are addressed in the text of this review.
