Andrews, Walter GBarrett, Elizabeth Page2015-09-292015-09-292015Barrett_washington_0250O_14844.pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/33530Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2015As in all legal disputes, there are many versions of this story. One party claims the other broke a contract by failing to pay off a debt. The other argues the contract was never legally binding and he was coerced into signing it in the first place. This may sound like a fairly pedestrian civil case. However, Svoboda v. Pachachi (1856) was beyond unusual—it was a scandal that titillated ‘Victorian Baghdad’; it embodied the clash between European colonial ambitions and Ottoman sovereignty; it is a story about a fortune in buried treasure. Most importantly, it offers historians insight into provincial legal practices in the midst of the upheaval of the Tanzimat reforms.application/pdfen-USCopyright is held by the individual authors.Capitulations; Consular courts; Forum shopping; Iraq; Legal pluralism; Ottoman EmpireMiddle Eastern studiesHistoryLawInternational Studies - Middle EastThesis