Global prevalence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis among adults with bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis, 2015-2025: a systematic review and meta-analysis with assessment of HIV co-infection
Date
relationships.isAuthorOf
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Background: Although the progress has been made under the World Health Organization(WHO) End TB Strategy, extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) remains an important
challenge to global TB control. Patients with XDR-TB face prolonged treatment options with
associated drug toxicity, and the outcomes remain poor. Understanding the prevalence of XDRTB
is essential for assessing its global burden and informing surveillance and control strategies.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to estimate the global
prevalence of XDR-TB among adults with bacteriologically confirmed TB. PubMed was searched
for studies published between January 2015 and December 2025. Observational studies
reporting XDR-TB prevalence using either the pre-2021 or revised 2021 WHO definitions were
included. Pooled prevalence was estimated using the Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine
transformation with restricted maximum likelihood estimation (REML). Between-study
heterogeneity was assessed using the I² and the association between the proportion of
previously treated patients and XDR-TB prevalence was evaluated by meta-regression. Data on PLHIV and mortality were summarized descriptively. Subgroup analyses examined study
settings, geographic region, age group, and treatment history and diagnostic methods.
Results: Among 42 studies,159,371 individuals with bacteriologically confirmed tuberculosis,
among whom 4,500 XDR-TB cases were included in the analysis. The pooled prevalence of
XDR-TB was 1.48% (95% CI: 0.68%-2.55%), with high between-study heterogeneity (I² =
98.9%). After the exclusion of one outlier study, the pooled prevalence decreased to 1.11 %
(95% CI: 0.60%-1.74%) with persistent high heterogeneity (I² = 98.6%). Among studies using
the pre-2021 WHO definition, the pooled prevalence was 1.10% (95% CI: 0.57%-1.79%; I² =
98.7%). Only three studies applied the revised 2021 WHO definition, with prevalence estimates
ranging from 0.37% to 2.43% which was insufficient for comparison between definition groups.
Evidence on HIV-associated XDR-TB remained limited across the included studies. XDR-TB
prevalence was significantly higher among previously treated TB cases (2.71%, 95% CI: 1.04%-
5.01%) than among new TB cases (0.38%, 95% CI: 0.06%-0.90%; p = 0.0014). Meta regression
revealed a significant positive association between the proportion of previously
treated patients and XDR-TB prevalence (coefficient = 0.0216, p = 0.0137). Mortality outcomes
were reported only in two studies. Prevalence varied significantly by study setting and region. In
contrast, no statistically significant differences were observed by age group or diagnostic
methods.
Conclusion: Despite significant variation among studies and contexts, the frequency of XDRTB
among individuals with bacteriologically confirmed TB was comparatively low. Previously
treated TB patients had substantially higher XDR-TB prevalence than new TB cases (2.71% vs
0.38%) indicating that treatment history is an important indicator for drug-resistant TB
surveillance and the need to focus TB control strategies on this group. The limited availability of
accessible research restricted the interpretation of HIV-specific prevalence, mortality, and
studies using the revised 2021 WHO definition. To address these evidence gaps.
additional research and more studies using the consistent definitions and reporting of HIVstratified
outcomes are needed.
Keywords: extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis; XDR-TB; tuberculosis; prevalence;
systematic review; meta-analysis; drug-resistant tuberculosis
Description
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2026
