Eye and I: Assumptive Folly in the I and the Institution

dc.contributor.advisorMcNeel, Amie
dc.contributor.authorCalimpong, Granite
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T22:26:29Z
dc.date.available2019-08-14T22:26:29Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-14
dc.date.submitted2019
dc.descriptionThesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2019
dc.description.abstractFollowing is a discussion of bias in the visual processing system and the complex, intertwined relationship between both physiologically determined and socially/culturally determined forms of bias. Through an examination of historical attitudes towards objectivity in relationship to perception, and a discussion of the ways in which prevailing attitudes have not kept pace with current science, I explore the intersection between assumptions, orthodoxy, and objectivity. The perceptive faculties harbor evolutionarily inherited forms of preference, while the act of viewing art bears the burden of long histories of accepted practices. Additionally, the institutions where we interact with art frame the experiences of interaction, dictating possible outcomes of engagement within those frameworks. Through an examination of various artists and scientists work, and a discussion of my own work, I establish an avenue to discuss the importance of contemplating bias in the eye, the mind, and the institution.
dc.embargo.termsOpen Access
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.otherCalimpong_washington_0250O_20267.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/43940
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsnone
dc.subject
dc.subjectFine arts
dc.subject.otherFine arts
dc.titleEye and I: Assumptive Folly in the I and the Institution
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Calimpong_washington_0250O_20267.pdf
Size:
1.6 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections