No protection: Does offering dating partners the same legal protection as married partners prevent firearm-related intimate partner homicide? A cross-sectional analysis from 1976-2010
| dc.contributor.advisor | Gakidou, Emmanuela | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Alvarado, Miriam Ronda | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-11-14T20:58:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-12-14T17:55:52Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013-11-14 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2013 | en_US |
| dc.description | Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2013 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | <bold>Background</bold>: In 2010, at least 1,300 people were killed by an intimate partner in the United States. Guns are used in the majority of intimate partner homicides (IPH). Previous research has shown that state-specific laws that prohibit individuals with a domestic violence restraining order (DVRO) from owning or purchasing a gun are associated with a decrease in IPH. However, only 22 states allowed dating partners to file for domestic violence restraining orders as of 2010. <bold>Objective</bold>: This study will focus on whether state-specific DVRO laws that protect dating partners have been associated with declines in firearm-related dating IPH. <bold>Design</bold>: We used a negative binomial regression model and controlled for median income, background violent crime rate, percent urban, percent black, and percent under 35 years old. We conducted a sensitivity analysis controlling for four additional IPH-related gun control laws. <bold>Main outcome measures</bold>: Four main outcome measures were used: the number of female gun-related IPH, the number of female all-cause IPH, the number of all gun-related IPH, and the number of all-cause IPH. <bold>Results</bold>: Expanding the domestic violence restraining order law to protect dating partners was associated with a decline in dating IPH (p=.001). In 2010, we estimated 110 (76-145) deaths were averted because of protections afforded to dating partners in 22 states. If all states had implemented this law, an additional 84 (60-109) deaths could have been prevented. Cumulatively, 937 (564 -1,325) deaths have been averted from 1994-2010 because of DVRO protections for dating partners. If all states had passed the expanded law to protect dating partners in 1994, an additional 885 (453-1,317) deaths could have been averted over the same period. <bold>Conclusions</bold>: The evidence suggests that expanding DVRO laws to protect dating partners may reduce the annual number of intimate partner homicides in the US. | en_US |
| dc.embargo.terms | Delay release for 2 years -- then make Open Access | en_US |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | Alvarado_washington_0250O_12239.pdf | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1773/24279 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.rights | Copyright is held by the individual authors. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Domestic Violence; Evaluation; Firearms; Gun control; Intimate Partner Homicide; United States | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Public health | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Law | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | global health | en_US |
| dc.title | No protection: Does offering dating partners the same legal protection as married partners prevent firearm-related intimate partner homicide? A cross-sectional analysis from 1976-2010 | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Alvarado_washington_0250O_12239.pdf
- Size:
- 497.71 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
