Patient Variability in Sciatic Nerve Branch Point Distance Using Ultrasound Guided Localization
Loading...
Date
Authors
Lollo, Loreto
Stogicza, Agnes
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Austin Journal of Anesthesia and Analgesia
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Improved ultrasound and needle technology
make popliteal sciatic nerve blockade a popular anesthetic technique and
imaging to localize the branch point of the common peroneal and posterior tibial
components is important because successful blockade techniques vary with
respect to injection of the common trunk proximally or separate injections distally.
Nerve stimulation, ultrasound, cadaveric and magnetic resonance studies
demonstrate variability in distance and discordance between imaging and
anatomic examination of the branch point. The popliteal crease and imprecise,
inaccessible landmarks render measurement of the branch point variable and
inaccurate. The purpose of this study was to use the tibial tuberosity, a fixed
bony reference, to measure the distance of the branch point.
Method: During popliteal sciatic nerve blockade in the supine position the
branch point was identified by ultrasound and the block needle was inserted.
The vertical distance from the tibial tuberosity prominence and needle insertion
point was measured.
Results: In 92 patients the branch point is a mean distance of 12.91 cm
proximal to the tibial tuberosity and more proximal in male (13.74 cm) than female
patients (12.08 cm). Body height is related to the branch point distance and is
more proximal in taller patients. Separation into two nerve branches during local
anesthetic injection supports notions of more proximal neural anatomic division.
Limitations: Imaging of the sciatic nerve division may not equal its true
anatomic separation.
Conclusion: Refinements in identification and resolution of the anatomic
division of the nerve branch point will determine if more accurate localization is
of any clinical significance for successful nerve blockade.
Description
Citation
Austin J Anesthesia and Analgesia - Volume 2 Issue 5 - 2014
