Statistical evaluation of coincident prolactin and luteinizing hormone pulses during the normal menstrual cycle

dc.contributor.authorSteiner, Robert A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBremner, William J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSoules, Michael R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorClifton, Donald K.en_US
dc.contributor.authorAksel, Sezeren_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-10-17T20:41:09Z
dc.date.available2008-10-17T20:41:09Z
dc.date.issued1988-10en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this work was 2-fold. First, we sought to develop statistical criteria by which it could be established that the coincident occurrence of pulses of two different hormones exceeds that which would occur by chance alone, thereby suggesting that secretion of the two hormones is either coupled or controlled from a single source generator. Using computer simulations of uncoupled pulse generators operating at different frequencies, we were able to derive the appropriate statistical criteria and to apply them to achieve our second objective, to determine whether the occasional coincidence of plasma LH and serum PRL pulses that occurs throughout the menstrual cycle in normal women exceeds that which would happen by chance. The results of the computer simulations indicated that pulses emanating from two completely independent oscillators will occur coincidently at a predictable rate, despite the fact that the generator sources are not coupled; moreover, the rate of coincidence is increased when the pulse frequency of one of the source generators is increased. Using this knowledge and the statistical criteria we derived, we analyzed the coincidence of LH and PRL pulses in five normal women during their early follicular, late follicular, and midluteal phases and in another five women during their late luteal phase. We found that the number of PRL pulses that occurred coincidently with LH pulses consistently exceeded that which would be predicted if the two pulse generators were operating completely independently of one another; however, only during the late follicular and late luteal phases was the coincidence level between LH and PRL pulses sufficiently high in a sufficient number of women to conclude that there was coupling between the pulse sources. These studies suggest, first, that stringent and rigorous statistical criteria must be applied to the analysis of spontaneously coincident secretory phenomena before it can be deduced that two pulse generators are indeed coupled, and second, that the pulse generators governing the secretion of PRL and LH are probably coupled, at least during certain phases of the menstrual cycle.en_US
dc.identifier.citationJ Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1988 Oct;67(4):832-8en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/4336
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEndocrine Societyen_US
dc.subjectmale contraceptionen_US
dc.subjectandrologyen_US
dc.subject.meshResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.en_US
dc.subject.meshProlactin, secretionen_US
dc.subject.meshSecretory Rateen_US
dc.subject.meshResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.en_US
dc.subject.meshComputer Simulationen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshLuteinizing Hormone, secretionen_US
dc.subject.meshData Interpretation, Statisticalen_US
dc.subject.meshMonte Carlo Methoden_US
dc.subject.meshProbabilityen_US
dc.subject.meshMenstrual Cycleen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.titleStatistical evaluation of coincident prolactin and luteinizing hormone pulses during the normal menstrual cycleen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JCEM_1988_Statistical_Evaluation_Coincident.pdf
Size:
120.06 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.85 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: