Association Between Caregiver Opposition to Topical Fluoride and COVID-19 Vaccines
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chi, Donald L | |
| dc.contributor.author | Saini, Sapna Jennifer | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-14T22:08:35Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-07-14T22:08:35Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022-07-14 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2022 | |
| dc.description | Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Purpose: Caregivers who oppose topical fluoride may be opposed to other preventive treatments, including COVID-19 vaccines. The study objective was to examine the association between caregiver opposition to topical fluoride and COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: The study took place at the University of Washington in Seattle, WA. English-speaking caregivers of children aged <18 years were eligible to participate. An 85-item REDCap survey was administered from February to September 2021. The predictor variable was topical fluoride opposition (no/yes). The outcome was COVID-19 vaccine opposition (no/yes). The models included the following covariates: child and caregiver age; caregiver race and ethnicity, education level, insurance type, parenting style, political ideology, and religiosity; and household income. Logistic regression models generated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (α=0.05). Results: Six-hundred-fifty-one caregivers participated, and 403 caregivers were included in the final regression model. Mean child age was 8.5 years (SD 4.2), mean caregiver age was 42.1 years (SD 9.1), 53.0% of caregivers were female, 57.3% self-reported as white, and 65.5% were insured by Medicaid. There was a significant positive association between topical fluoride and COVID-19 vaccine opposition (OR=3.13; 95% CI: 1.87, 5.25; p<0.001). Other factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine opposition included conservative political views (OR=2.77; 95% CI: 1.26, 6.08; p<0.011) and lower education (OR=3.47; 95% CI: 1.44, 8.38; p<0.006). Conclusions: Caregivers opposed to topical fluoride in dental settings are significantly more likely to oppose COVID-19 vaccines for their child. Future research should identify ways to address both topical fluoride and vaccine opposition to prevent diseases in children. | |
| dc.embargo.terms | Open Access | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.other | Saini_washington_0250O_24109.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1773/48901 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.rights | none | |
| dc.subject | COVID-19 | |
| dc.subject | fluoride hesitancy | |
| dc.subject | fluoride opposition | |
| dc.subject | topical fluoride | |
| dc.subject | vaccine hesitancy | |
| dc.subject | Dentistry | |
| dc.subject | Public health | |
| dc.subject.other | Dentistry | |
| dc.title | Association Between Caregiver Opposition to Topical Fluoride and COVID-19 Vaccines | |
| dc.type | Thesis |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Saini_washington_0250O_24109.pdf
- Size:
- 1.72 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
