The Damascus Spring: Assessing its Fragility and Stagnation

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorKasaba, Reşat
dc.contributor.authorRoller, Samuel
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-14T17:01:07Z
dc.date.available2023-08-14T17:01:07Z
dc.date.issued2023-08-14
dc.date.submitted2023
dc.descriptionThesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2023
dc.description.abstractThis paper compares the Damascus Spring and Syrian Revolution through the political process model of social movement theory. In doing so this paper identifies the key differences between the two mobilizations which have utility in responding to the instrumental question of why the Damascus Spring was so fragile and why it succumbed to stagnation. Through this process, this paper seeks to deepen the utility of existing English-language scholarship on the Damascus Spring by structuring available information to distinguish the importance of different events and processes to the Damascus Spring as a whole.
dc.embargo.termsOpen Access
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.otherRoller_washington_0250O_25864.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/50169
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-SA
dc.subjectDamascus Spring
dc.subjectMichel Kilo
dc.subjectPolitical Process Model
dc.subjectRiad Seif
dc.subjectSocial Movement Theory
dc.subjectSyrian Revolution
dc.subjectMiddle Eastern studies
dc.subject.other
dc.titleThe Damascus Spring: Assessing its Fragility and Stagnation
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Roller_washington_0250O_25864.pdf
Size:
1.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

International studies – Middle East