Three Creative Tensions in Document Interpretation Theory Set as Evidence of the Need fora Descriptive Informatics

dc.contributor.authorTennis, Joseph T.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-19T22:28:58Z
dc.date.available2017-01-19T22:28:58Z
dc.date.created2009
dc.description.abstractDescribes three tensions in the theoretical literature of indexing: chief sources of evidence indexing, process of indexing (rubrics and methods), and philosophical position of indexing scholarship. Following this exposition, we argue for a change in perspective in Knowledge Organization research. Using the difference between prescriptive and descriptive linguis- tics as a metaphor, we advocate for a shift to a more descriptive, rather than the customary prescriptive, approach to the theo- retical and empirical study of indexing, and by extension Knowledge Organization.
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.citationTennis, Joseph T. Three Creative Tensions in Document Interpretation Theory Set as Evidence of the Need for a Descriptive Informatics. Knowledge Organization, 36(4), 190-199.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/37946
dc.publisherKnowledge Organization
dc.titleThree Creative Tensions in Document Interpretation Theory Set as Evidence of the Need fora Descriptive Informatics
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Tennis2009KO32-4.pdf
Size:
240.48 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format