Postmodern Ecocritical Poetics: Contemporary Responses to Romantic Aesthetics of the Sublime and the Picturesque

dc.contributor.advisorTriplett, Pimone
dc.contributor.authorKelly, Ainsley E
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-31T21:11:48Z
dc.date.issued2018-07-31
dc.date.submitted2018
dc.descriptionThesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2018
dc.description.abstractThis essay explores the ways in which contemporary poets critique and reappropriate the Romantic aesthetics of the sublime and the picturesque in nature poetry. I examine how contemporary poets use craft to expose suppressed histories of violence situated in a particular landscape while retaining, transforming, or disavowing the pleasure of sublime awe. I examine the ways contemporary poets Ed Roberson and Brian Teare transform the Romantic aesthetics of the sublime and picturesque into a postmodern sublime which is collective, mediated, and intersectional. I give an overview of Romantic versus contemporary definitions of the Sublime and the Picturesque and discuss some of the transformations that contemporary poets are making to Romantic aesthetics by doing close readings of Roberson’s “be careful” and Teare’s Companion Grasses.
dc.embargo.lift2019-07-31T21:11:48Z
dc.embargo.termsDelay release for 1 year -- then make Open Access
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.otherKelly_washington_0250O_18877.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/42301
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND
dc.subjectecocriticism
dc.subjectecopoetics
dc.subjectpoetry
dc.subjectpostcolonial
dc.subjectromantic
dc.subjectsublime
dc.subjectCreative writing
dc.subject.otherEnglish
dc.titlePostmodern Ecocritical Poetics: Contemporary Responses to Romantic Aesthetics of the Sublime and the Picturesque
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Kelly_washington_0250O_18877.pdf
Size:
276.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections