Birth Setting Related Outcomes Among Low-Risk, Midwife-Attended Births in Washington State
Date
relationships.isAuthorOf
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Background: Community births attended by midwives have gained attention for their potential to support physiologic childbirth and reduce medical interventions compared to hospital births. However, outcomes comparing midwife-attended births following low-risk pregnancies in community and hospital settings remain understudied. Among midwife-attended births, we examined overall and parity-specific associations of birth setting with physiologic birth and hospital admission within 30 days of delivery for birthing parents and infants. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from the Obstetrical Care Outcomes Assessment Program (OB COAP) in Washington State. The study included 1,442 low-risk midwife-attended births between January 2022 and March 2023. Planned birth settings were categorized as community (home or birth center) or hospital. Physiologic childbirth (defined as spontaneous labor and birth without medical interventions) and hospital admissions within 30 days post-delivery for birthing parents or newborns were the primary outcomes. We used crude and adjusted (for birthing parent age, geographic residence, race, ethnicity, insurance payor type, parity, gestational age, and pre-pregnancy body mass index) modified Poisson regression models to estimate relative risks (RRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We also evaluated parity as a potential effect modifier of the associations using stratified analyses and models with interaction terms.
Results: Among study participants, 744 birthing parents (51.6%) had planned community births. Overall, 55.5% of birthing parents in the sample of low-risk midwife-attended births experienced a physiologic birth, and 0.9% of birthing parents and 2.1% of newborns were admitted to the hospital within 30 days of delivery. Community births had a higher likelihood of physiologic childbirth compared to hospital births (aRR: 5.95, 95% CI: 4.98-7.10). This association was stronger among nulliparous parents (aRR: 10.32, 95% CI: 6.96-15.29) than multiparous parents (aRR: 4.77, 95% CI: 3.93-5.79) (interaction p-value < 0.01). There was no significant difference in hospital admissions/readmission for birthing parents (aRR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.32-2.73) or newborns (aRR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.38-1.78) between planned community and hospital births. Similarly, we did not observe significant birth setting and hospital admission associations among groups stratified by parity (all p-values in stratified models and interaction p-value > 0.05).
Conclusion: Planned community births attended by midwives in Washington State had higher rates of physiologic childbirth compared to hospital births, particularly among nulliparous parents. These findings support the role of midwifery care in promoting physiologic birth, suggesting community birth as a viable option for low-risk pregnancies. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and address variations across different settings and populations.
Description
Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2024
