A Convenient Verisimilitude or Oppressive Internalization? Characterizing the Ethical Arguments surrounding Hierarchical Structures in Knowledge Organization Systems

dc.contributor.authorTennis, Joseph T.
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-19T22:29:59Z
dc.date.available2017-01-19T22:29:59Z
dc.date.created2012
dc.description.abstractThis paper considers the ethical concerns that surface around hierarchy as structure in knowledge organization systems. In order to do this, I consider the relationship between semantics and structure and argue for a separation of the two in design and critique of knowledge organization systems. The paper closes with an argument that agency and intention, as ethical concerns in knowledge organization, lead us to argue for a neutral stance on hierarchy.
dc.format.mimetypepdf
dc.identifier.citationTennis, Joseph T. A Convenient Verisimilitude or Oppressive Internalization?: Characterizing the Ethical Augments Surrounding Hierarchical Structures in Knowledge Organization Systems. Knowledge Organization. 39(5), 394-397.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/37963
dc.publisherKnowledge Organization
dc.titleA Convenient Verisimilitude or Oppressive Internalization? Characterizing the Ethical Arguments surrounding Hierarchical Structures in Knowledge Organization Systems
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Tennis2012KnowledgeOrganization.pdf
Size:
179.57 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format