Beyond the Food Label: Nutrient Profiling the Indian Nutrient Databank Comparing WHO South-East Asia and NRF 9.3 Scores to Inform Public Nutrition Policy

dc.contributor.advisorDrewnowski, Adam
dc.contributor.authorGurudatta, Greeshma
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-16T18:32:38Z
dc.date.issued2026-09-16
dc.date.submitted2026
dc.descriptionThesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2026
dc.description.abstractThis study applied different nutrient profiling models to the Indian Nutrient Databank (INB), to classify and describe Indian foods. The INB is a database of home-cooked recipes and dishes (rather than packaged, branded products) including 1014 foods, 940 of which met inclusion criteria for this analysis. Foods were organized using a novel “What We Eat in India” food categorization scheme (broad food groups, each with more specific subgroups) comprising of 11 food groups and 28 subgroups[PC1.1]. Two nutrient profiling (NP) methods were applied: the dichotomous (pass/fail[PC2.1]), meaning a food is classified as passing or failing category-specific nutrient thresholds, World Health Organization for South-East Asia Region (SEARO) NP model and the continuous Nutrient Rich Food (NRF) 9.3 nutrient-density score. The WHO model uses 100 g as the base of calculation; the NRF 9.3 system uses 100 kcal. Under the WHO SEARO model, only 27.1% of foods passed; total fat was the leading driver of failure (52.2% of foods), followed by total sugar (30.5%). Under NRF 9.3, most foods scored negative (mean -39.0; 20% positive), indicating most foods had more factors to limit (Fat, sugar and sodium) then nutrient to consume. Vegetables were the only food group with a positive mean. The two models showed agreement on 80.1% of foods. Some foods eaten in small portions were penalized in the WHO SEARO model because of the per 100 g basis. These findings show that NP models can be applied to recipes for home-cooked foods and not just to packaged processed foods as home preparation does not inherently confer a more favorable nutrient composition[PC3.1]. Further, the base of calculation (100 g vs 100 kcal) can alter nutrient density scores, as can the choice of index nutrients; nutrient profiling models should credit beneficial (encourage) nutrients as well as flag nutrients to limit, rather than accounting for only one side of a food's nutrient content. NP models that include typical recipes can provide a more complete basis for nutrition policy in India.
dc.embargo.lift2028-09-05T18:32:38Z
dc.embargo.termsRestrict to UW for 2 years -- then make Open Access
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.otherGurudatta_washington_0250O_30254.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1773/57849
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsnone
dc.subjectIndian home cooked recipes
dc.subjectNutrient profiling
dc.subjectNutrient rich model
dc.subjectWHO SEA nutrient profiling
dc.subjectNutrition
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.subject.otherNutritional sciences
dc.titleBeyond the Food Label: Nutrient Profiling the Indian Nutrient Databank Comparing WHO South-East Asia and NRF 9.3 Scores to Inform Public Nutrition Policy
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gurudatta_washington_0250O_30254.pdf
Size:
385.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format