The induction of premature luteolysis in normal women--follicular phase luteinizing hormone secretion and corpus luteum function in the subsequent cycle
Date
relationships.isAuthorOf
Rivier, Jean E.
Dahl, Kristine D.
Clifton, Donald K.
Vale, Wylie W.
Soules, Michael R.
Bremner, William J.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Elsevier
Abstract
Women with luteal phase deficiency have been shown to have an increased
frequency of luteinizing hormone pulses in the early follicular phase of
the menstrual cycle. Because progesterone is known to modulate luteinizing
hormone secretion, it has been hypothesized that the decreased
progesterone secretion in a previous luteal phase deficiency cycle could
lead to the abnormal luteinizing hormone secretory pattern in the ensuing
early follicular phase. With the possibility that the higher luteinizing
hormone pulse frequency might lead to another deficient luteal phase, it
becomes conceivable that luteal phase deficiency could be
self-perpetuating. To test this hypothesis, luteal phase deficiency was
induced in six normal women by decreasing luteinizing hormone support of
the corpus luteum with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist
Nal-Glu, administered twice daily beginning in the midluteal phase after a
control cycle. During the antagonist-treated luteal phase, each subject
met the predetermined criteria for induced luteal phase deficiency: a 33%
or greater decrease in integrated progesterone from the control cycle and
an integrated progesterone level less than 100 ng/ml per day. Luteinizing
hormone secretion patterns were determined by frequent blood sampling
performed every 10 minutes for 12 hours in the early follicular phase of
the control cycle and the cycle after antagonist administration. Daily
luteal progesterone levels were measured in the control, treatment, and
posttreatment cycles. Each volunteer served as her own control. Standard
parameters were compared between the control and posttreatment pulse
studies in the early follicular phase: (1) luteinizing hormone pulse
frequency was 9.5 +/- 1.0 vs 10.0 +/- 0.9 pulses/12 hours, control vs
posttreatment, respectively, p = 0.5; (2) luteinizing hormone pulse
amplitude was 11.0 +/- 1.3 vs 12.0 +/- 2.2 ng/ml, p = 0.6; and (3)
luteinizing hormone mean level was 19.4 +/- 2.3 vs 22.2 +/- 3.3 ng/ml, p =
0.1. Corpus luteum function was also compared between the control and
posttreatment cycles. Luteal phase length was 13.7 +/- 0.6 vs 12.7 +/- 0.6
days, p = 0.08. Integrated progesterone values were 136.9 +/- 12.9 vs
130.5 +/- 11.3 ng/ml per day, p = 0.5. Therefore no discernible
abnormalities in early follicular luteinizing hormone secretions or corpus
luteum secretion of progesterone occurred after an induced luteal phase
deficiency cycle.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Description
Citation
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Apr;164(4):989-94; discussion 994-6
