A Network Approach to PTSD: Comparing Interview and Self-Report Networks

dc.contributor.advisorZoellner, Lori
dc.contributor.authorRosencrans, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-15T23:01:42Z
dc.date.available2019-10-15T23:01:42Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-15
dc.date.submitted2019
dc.descriptionThesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2019
dc.description.abstractPTSD may be characterized by networks of causal interactions among symptoms, and network analyses can identify central symptoms and processes that may be targeted for precise treatment. In this emerging area, few studies have examined treatment-seeking individuals with PTSD, limiting the clinical utility and generalizability of network analytic findings. In addition, there has been a reliance on self-report, as opposed to interviewer-assessed measures of PTSD symptoms, and a lack of systematic comparisons of the two assessment modalities. This study examined both self-report and interviewer-assessed PTSD network models. Treatment-seeking adults with primary PTSD (N = 350) completed interview and self-report measures of PTSD severity (PTSD Symptom Scale – Interview; Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale). Analyses included regularized partial correlation network estimation, stability analyses, centrality and community detection analyses, and network comparison tests. Centrality profiles were similar across the networks (rs = .71). Reactivity to trauma cues and interpersonal detachment demonstrating the strongest centrality, suggesting that cue reactivity and interpersonal processes may drive or be driven by other PTSD symptoms. The self-report network featured more and stronger relationships between symptoms compared to the interview network (global strength delta = 4.57, p = .002), particularly those with strong content similarities, such as avoidance of internal and external reminders, suggesting that interview assessments may offer superior specificity compared to self-report in assessing PTSD symptom relationships. Future network analytic studies should take into account assessment modality, and both re-experiencing and dysphoric symptoms, particularly interpersonal phenomena, should factor into targeted treatment and prevention approaches. Supplemental materials include Supplemental Method, Supplemental Tables 1 and 2, and Supplemental Figures 1 through 6.
dc.embargo.termsOpen Access
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.otherRosencrans_washington_0250O_20770.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/44898
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.haspartRosencrans_UW_Masters_Thesis_SUPPLEMENT_7 30 19.pdf; pdf; Supplemental Materials.
dc.rightsnone
dc.subjectnetwork analysis
dc.subjectPosttraumatic stress disorder
dc.subjectPTSD
dc.subjectClinical psychology
dc.subjectStatistics
dc.subject.otherPsychology
dc.titleA Network Approach to PTSD: Comparing Interview and Self-Report Networks
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rosencrans_washington_0250O_20770.pdf
Size:
442.56 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Rosencrans_UW_Masters_Thesis_SUPPLEMENT_7 30 19.pdf
Size:
354.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections