Enhancing Technology Fingerprinting Through Human-Generated OSINT: A Comparative Study Against Tool-Only Reconnaissance

dc.contributor.advisorChen, Min
dc.contributor.authorMalpathak, Yash Mahesh
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-11T19:18:30Z
dc.date.issued2026-08-11
dc.date.submitted2026
dc.descriptionThesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2026
dc.description.abstractTechnology fingerprinting, the identification of software frameworks, cloud platforms, programming languages, and infrastructure components used by an organization, is a foundational stage of cybersecurity reconnaissance. Automated scanning tools such as Nmap, WhatWeb, and Subfinder are widely used for this purpose. However, these tools share a structural limitation: they primarily detect technologies that produce externally observable signals at the network perimeter, while application-layer frameworks, backend infrastructure, and internal development tooling may remain invisible to tool-based reconnaissance.This thesis investigates whether human-generated open-source intelligence (OSINT), specifically job postings, LinkedIn employee profiles, and GitHub public repositories, can serve as a complementary signal class for improving technology fingerprinting. An empirical study was conducted across twelve purposively selected organizations. Three integration methods were designed and evaluated: a union-based model for maximum recall, a source-strength weighted model using empirically derived reliability values, and a rule-based evidence-tier model requiring no manually assigned numeric scores. Results show that the average Jaccard similarity between tool-detected and OSINT-detected technology sets is 0.005, with zero overlap in ten of twelve organizations. This confirms that the two signal classes are largely complementary rather than redundant. Human-generated OSINT contributed 857 organization-level detections absent from the tool-only baseline, representing an average coverage gain of 94.1%. The dominant OSINT-only categories were programming languages at 34.66% and application frameworks at 17.74%. All three integration methods produced substantially richer fingerprints than tool-only reconnaissance, with integration coverage gains ranging from 53.85% to 96.35%. Only five technologies across the full dataset achieved cross-source validation between tools and OSINT. These findings demonstrate that human-generated OSINT provides a quantifiably valuable complement to active scanning in technology fingerprinting workflows.
dc.embargo.termsOpen Access
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.otherMalpathak_washington_0250O_29799.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1773/56989
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsnone
dc.subjectActive Reconnaissance
dc.subjectAttack Surface Analysis
dc.subjectEvidence-Based Classification
dc.subjectHuman-Generated OSINT
dc.subjectSource Integration
dc.subjectTechnology Fingerprinting
dc.subjectComputer science
dc.subject.otherComputing and software systems
dc.titleEnhancing Technology Fingerprinting Through Human-Generated OSINT: A Comparative Study Against Tool-Only Reconnaissance
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Malpathak_washington_0250O_29799.pdf
Size:
1.73 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format