Enhancing Technology Fingerprinting Through Human-Generated OSINT: A Comparative Study Against Tool-Only Reconnaissance
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chen, Min | |
| dc.contributor.author | Malpathak, Yash Mahesh | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-11T19:18:30Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-08-11 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026 | |
| dc.description | Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Technology fingerprinting, the identification of software frameworks, cloud platforms, programming languages, and infrastructure components used by an organization, is a foundational stage of cybersecurity reconnaissance. Automated scanning tools such as Nmap, WhatWeb, and Subfinder are widely used for this purpose. However, these tools share a structural limitation: they primarily detect technologies that produce externally observable signals at the network perimeter, while application-layer frameworks, backend infrastructure, and internal development tooling may remain invisible to tool-based reconnaissance.This thesis investigates whether human-generated open-source intelligence (OSINT), specifically job postings, LinkedIn employee profiles, and GitHub public repositories, can serve as a complementary signal class for improving technology fingerprinting. An empirical study was conducted across twelve purposively selected organizations. Three integration methods were designed and evaluated: a union-based model for maximum recall, a source-strength weighted model using empirically derived reliability values, and a rule-based evidence-tier model requiring no manually assigned numeric scores. Results show that the average Jaccard similarity between tool-detected and OSINT-detected technology sets is 0.005, with zero overlap in ten of twelve organizations. This confirms that the two signal classes are largely complementary rather than redundant. Human-generated OSINT contributed 857 organization-level detections absent from the tool-only baseline, representing an average coverage gain of 94.1%. The dominant OSINT-only categories were programming languages at 34.66% and application frameworks at 17.74%. All three integration methods produced substantially richer fingerprints than tool-only reconnaissance, with integration coverage gains ranging from 53.85% to 96.35%. Only five technologies across the full dataset achieved cross-source validation between tools and OSINT. These findings demonstrate that human-generated OSINT provides a quantifiably valuable complement to active scanning in technology fingerprinting workflows. | |
| dc.embargo.terms | Open Access | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.other | Malpathak_washington_0250O_29799.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1773/56989 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.rights | none | |
| dc.subject | Active Reconnaissance | |
| dc.subject | Attack Surface Analysis | |
| dc.subject | Evidence-Based Classification | |
| dc.subject | Human-Generated OSINT | |
| dc.subject | Source Integration | |
| dc.subject | Technology Fingerprinting | |
| dc.subject | Computer science | |
| dc.subject.other | Computing and software systems | |
| dc.title | Enhancing Technology Fingerprinting Through Human-Generated OSINT: A Comparative Study Against Tool-Only Reconnaissance | |
| dc.type | Thesis |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Malpathak_washington_0250O_29799.pdf
- Size:
- 1.73 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
