Prolactin secretion and corpus luteum function in women with luteal phase deficiency
Loading...
Date
Authors
Steiner, Robert A.
Clifton, Donald K.
Soules, Michael R.
Bremner, William J.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Endocrine Society
Abstract
Luteal phase deficiency (LPD) as a clinical infertility problem is
considered to have a heterogeneous etiology. Hyperprolactinemia has long
been considered a causative factor of LPD. In this context we investigated
PRL secretion in 18 women with LPD. All of the subjects were infertile
with 2 out of phase (greater than 2 days) endometrial biopsies; 10 of the
women also had daily blood samples, this latter subgroup had significantly
decreased integrated luteal phase progesterone (P) levels compared to
normal women with in-phase biopsies. PRL secretion was investigated as
follows: 1) daily blood levels; 2) pulsatile secretion patterns in 3 cycle
phase [early follicular (12 h); late follicular (12 h); midluteal (24 h)],
3) LH-PRL coupling, and 4) nocturnal patterns. Results were compared to
findings in 36 normal women. The mean daily levels of PRL over the
menstrual cycle were not different between the two groups (LPD, 12.1 +/-
1.5; normal, 13.8 +/- 0.8 microgram/L; P = 0.3). There was no correlation
between luteal phase integrated P and PRL levels for either group. There
was a small difference in the PRL pulse amplitude in the early follicular
phase between the LPD and normal women (2.6 +/- 0.3 vs. 5.5 +/- 1.3
micrograms/L; P less than 0.05). There were no significant differences
between groups in PRL pulse frequency or mean level during the 12 or 24 h
in any cycle phase. There was an equivalent amount of LH-PRL pulse
coupling in both groups in all three cycle phases. Diurnal and nocturnal
PRL secretion was studied by breaking the 24 h data (midluteal) into day
(0700-2300 h) and night (2300-0700) segments. Mean PRL levels were higher
at night in both groups (LPD, 15.9 vs. 12.6; normal, 15.4 vs. 9.3
micrograms/L; P less than 0.05), as expected. There were no differences in
nocturnal PRL secretory patterns between the two groups. In summary, we
have serious reservations whether abnormalities in PRL secretion are a
common or integral part of the pathophysiology of LPD. From previous work
we know these subtle abnormalities in PRL secretion in LPD are associated
with definite abnormalities in gonadotropin secretion. We believe these
gonadotropin abnormalities are probably more significant in terms of
decreased P secretion.
Description
Keywords
Citation
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1991 May;72(5):986-92
