The Washington Education Budget After McCleary: A Longitudinal Study of Court-Ordered Education Finance Reform
Date
relationships.isAuthorOf
Yared, Aaron B.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze the policy response of the Washington State
Legislature to the order handed down by the State Supreme Court in McCleary v. State of
Washington to reform the education finance system. It compares national historical trends
nationwide of court-ordered education finance reform as a benchmark for Washington’s case.
As a backdrop, according to a collection of studies arranged by the National Education
Association (NEA), there is a causal link between an increase in K-12 spending and quality of
education which leads to higher earnings post-graduation, an increased likelihood of going to
college, an increase in educational attainment, and a decrease in dropout rates.1 It was found that
a ten percent increase in education spending per student results in a two percent increase in posthigh
school graduate earnings and a 0.6% increase in educational attainment.2 It was also found
that a five-student decrease on average in the student-teacher ratio of a classroom resulted in a
0.4% increase of return on state-based institutional education and that a ten percent increase in
teacher salaries resulted in a 0.1% in institutional education; overall, they found that a 10%
increase in school investment results in a 1-2% increase in post-high school earnings.3 Another
study found that a ten percent decrease in teacher to student ratio would result in a 1-2% high
school graduation rate.4 Another study found that an increase in teacher salaries per student expenditures results in an increase in post-high school graduate income.5 Another study found
that whether or not teachers had graduate degrees had a positive correlative relationship with
high school graduates going to college; they also found that being in smaller classes in K-12
resulted in a higher chance of going to a four-year college as opposed to a two-year college.6 The
NEA also found that a funding cut to K-12 had a more significant negative effect on quality of
education than an equivalent increase. A study found that if there was a ten percent decrease in
the student-teacher ratio it would result in a 20% decrease in dropouts per birth cohort and a
proportional increase in high school graduates becoming college graduates.
