Effects of spatial constraints on channel network topology: implications for geomorphological inference

dc.contributor.authorCabral, Mariza Castanheira de Moura da Costaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-10-07T00:58:08Z
dc.date.available2009-10-07T00:58:08Z
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--University of Washington, 1997en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the fifty-two years since Robert Horton's 1945 pioneering quantitative description of channel network planform (or plan view morphology), no conclusive findings have been presented that permit inference of geomorphological processes from any measures of network planform. All measures of network planform studied exhibit limited geographic variability across different environments. Horton (1945), Langbein et al. (1947), Schumm (1956), Hack (1957), Melton (1958), and Gray (1961) established various "laws" of network planform, that is, statistical relationships between different variables which have limited variability. A wide variety of models which have been proposed to simulate the growth of channel networks in time over a landsurface are generally also in agreement with the above planform laws.An explanation is proposed for the generality of the channel network planform laws. Channel networks must be space filling, that is, they must extend over the landscape to drain every hillslope, leaving no large undrained areas, and with no crossing of channels, often achieving a roughly uniform drainage density in a given environment. It is shown that the space-filling constraint can reduce the sensitivity of planform variables to different network growth models, and it is proposed that this constraint may determine the planform laws.The "Q model" of network growth of Van Pelt and Verwer (1985) is used to generate samples of networks. Sensitivity to the model parameter Q is markedly reduced when the networks generated are required to be space filling. For a wide variety of Q values, the space-filling networks are in approximate agreement with the various channel network planform laws. Additional constraints, including of energy efficiency, were not studied but may further reduce the variability of planform laws.Inference of model parameter Q from network topology is successful only in networks not subject to spatial constraints. In space-filling networks, for a wide range of Q values, the maximal-likelihood Q parameter value is generally in the vicinity of 1/2, which yields topological randomness. It is proposed that space filling originates the appearance of randomness in channel network topology, and may cause difficulties to geomorphological inference from network planform.en_US
dc.format.extentxxvi, 209 p.en_US
dc.identifier.otherb41613387en_US
dc.identifier.other39904572en_US
dc.identifier.otherThesis 46462en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/10147
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the individual authors.en_US
dc.rights.urien_US
dc.subject.otherTheses--Civil engineeringen_US
dc.titleEffects of spatial constraints on channel network topology: implications for geomorphological inferenceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
9819215.pdf
Size:
8.39 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format