The reality of the soul in Plato

dc.contributor.advisor
dc.contributor.authorDe Lacy, Phillip
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-27T23:35:30Z
dc.date.available2019-09-27T23:35:30Z
dc.date.issued1933
dc.descriptionThesis (M.A.)--University of Washington, 1933
dc.description.abstractPlato's literary style was naturally adapted for the representation of divergent points of view; and the apparently contradictory statements which he puts in the mouth even of hismost important character, Socrates, cause endless difficulty to one who attempts to construct from the dialogues a unified Platonism. Nor is it easy to explain incompatible views by the theory that Plato's thought underwent some sort of evolution, since no doctrine seems to be confined to any one dialogue, or to any one group of dialogues.
dc.embargo.termsManuscript available on the University of Washington Campuses and via UW NetID. Full text may be available via Proquest's Dissertations and Theses Full Text database or through your local library's interlibrary loan service.
dc.format.extent64 leaves
dc.identifier.other19990704
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/44555
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightshttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.subjectSoul
dc.subject.otherThesis--Greek
dc.titleThe reality of the soul in Plato
dc.typeThesis

Files