Early Termination Provisions in Highways Public-Private Partnerships - Benchmark Framework and Implementations
| dc.contributor.advisor | Abdel Aziz, Ahmed M | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ccarita Cruz, Miriam | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-08-11T19:19:40Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-08-11 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2026 | |
| dc.description | Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2026 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Early Termination Provisions (ETPs) are core risk-management and governance mechanisms in Public–Private Partnership (PPP) contracts. They specify the circumstances under which a project agreement may be terminated before its contractual term expires, the procedures to follow, and the resulting consequences. Although leading institutional guidance addresses ETPs, its treatment is dispersed across mandates, drafting styles, and levels of procedural detail. Therefore, a coherent benchmark is needed to assess how ETPs are structured, articulated, and implemented in executed PPP contracts. This research develops and applies a benchmark framework for analyzing ETPs in highway PPP contracts, using qualitative content analysis and a case-study approach in two phases. The first phase reviews guidance documents and model contract materials from five institutions: the World Bank, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC), the Inter American Development Bank (IDB), and the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The analysis identifies five core ETP categories: private partner default, contracting authority default, voluntary termination, force majeure, and uninsurability. Each category is examined through three dimensions: circumstances and triggers, process, and consequences. These findings are translated into category-specific benchmark flowcharts. The second phase applies the benchmark to sixteen executed highway PPP agreements from Canada and the United States. Each agreement is analyzed to identify the termination categories present and to compare its contractual structure with the benchmark. The findings show that executed agreements generally reflect the core logic of institutional guidance while adapting ETPs to the lifecycle stage, financing structure, jurisdiction, risk allocation, and approval requirements. Overall, ETPs operate as staged, process-based, and last-resort mechanisms. The resulting frameworks provide public authorities with a concrete reference for ETP design and review in PPP contracts. | |
| dc.embargo.lift | 2027-08-11T19:19:40Z | |
| dc.embargo.terms | Restrict to UW for 1 year -- then make Open Access | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.other | CcaritaCruz_washington_0250O_29810.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1773/57009 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.rights | none | |
| dc.subject | Early Termination Provisions | |
| dc.subject | Highways PPPs | |
| dc.subject | Institutional Guidance | |
| dc.subject | PPP agreements | |
| dc.subject | Public-Private Partnerships | |
| dc.subject | Risk Allocation | |
| dc.subject | Transportation | |
| dc.subject | Law | |
| dc.subject | Management | |
| dc.subject.other | Construction management | |
| dc.title | Early Termination Provisions in Highways Public-Private Partnerships - Benchmark Framework and Implementations | |
| dc.type | Thesis |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- CcaritaCruz_washington_0250O_29810.pdf
- Size:
- 1.33 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
