How We Grow
| dc.contributor.advisor | Mohler, Richard | |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Nicholls, Jim | |
| dc.contributor.author | Loomans, Aaron | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2018-07-31T21:05:48Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2018-07-31T21:05:48Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2018-07-31 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2018 | |
| dc.description | Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2018 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Seattle is one of the fastest growing cities is the nation. It is critical that growth is handled in a way that does not detract from but rather supports the livability, walkability and sense of community in Seattle neighborhoods. Right now buildings are built in a way that addresses an immediate need for density. While accommodating density is important, the ramifications density has on space and form must be considered. An alternative growth model is needed. This model must be flexible, spatially integrated, and developed incrementally over time. Two significant variables must be looked at to achieve this alternative growth model; form and use. From a diverse range of individual immediate needs are reactions and response to how space is used. These responses are not prescribed and absolute but rather derived by the distinct character structure and form used to shape a space. There is a reciprocal relationship between user and space as each influence the other. Polyvalent spaces are those which may be fixed but can take on many functions as defined by form and need. Environment, season, time-of-day, demographics, opinion and personal preference are just a few external variables that determine how a single space is used. The second set of variables are constructed. Form, structure, scale, hierarchy, materiality, and texture all have influence on spatial use. Through polyvalent design, these constructed variables offer guidance and cues but do not impose definitive constraint. Too often the built environment segregates function through constructed constraints. This explicit segregation of function has negatively impacted sustainability, community, and affordability in the urban environment. This thesis explores the gradient that transverses the urban village edge. The design study analyzes several scales: neighborhood transect, block, courtyard and building. Specific spatial and programmatic overlaps exist among each. The intent is to design an incremental alternative growth model focused on form and use. This model must allow for sustainable urban village growth and accommodate several scales of community. | |
| dc.embargo.terms | Open Access | |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
| dc.identifier.other | Loomans_washington_0250O_18925.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1773/42030 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | |
| dc.rights | none | |
| dc.subject | Ballard | |
| dc.subject | Courtyard | |
| dc.subject | Density | |
| dc.subject | Growth | |
| dc.subject | Neighborhood | |
| dc.subject | Urban Village | |
| dc.subject | Architecture | |
| dc.subject.other | Architecture | |
| dc.title | How We Grow | |
| dc.type | Thesis |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Loomans_washington_0250O_18925.pdf
- Size:
- 64.4 MB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
