Giving Vaccination a Shot: Describing seasonal influenza vaccine hesitancy at Public Health - Seattle & King County

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Seymour, Matthew

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Abstract

Unlike healthcare workers, little research has been pursued to understand the reasons for declination of the seasonal influenza vaccine among clinical and non-clinical public health professionals. This research project aimed to describe the reasons for declination of the seasonal influenza vaccine as well as any motivating factors that might promote vaccination among a sample of 10 public health workers at Public Health - Seattle & King County. The results would inform possible areas for Public Health - Seattle & King County to target in order to increase their organizational rates of seasonal influenza vaccination. Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with each of the participants. The subsequent transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis [Hsieh & Shannon, 2005]; codes were developed from the research questions, interview guides, and the Health Belief Model. Participants declined for many reasons, including: lack of perceived susceptibility, lack of perceived benefits of vaccination, and concerns about the safety of the vaccine. Additionally, five categories of motivational factors emerged from the analysis: 1) evidence about influenza or seasonal influenza vaccine, 2) incentives to promote vaccination, 3) mandatory vaccination policies, 4) generalized risks of acquiring/transmitting seasonal influenza, and 5) personalized risks of acquiring/transmitting seasonal influenza. Measures adopted by Public Health - Seattle & King County that are perceived to be coercive may prompt some participants to reassert their anti-vaccination stance more firmly. Therefore, three areas were chosen for Public Health - Seattle & King County to target based on these results: 1) shifting perceptions away from influenza vaccination as a form of over-medication, 2) promoting vaccination as a way to benefit the common good, and 3) personalizing the risks of seasonal influenza. Pursuit of any or all of these recommendations hopefully will yield cost-effective interventions that can be utilized by Public Health - Seattle & King County to increase their organizational seasonal influenza vaccination rate.

Description

Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2014

Citation

DOI