Giving Vaccination a Shot: Describing seasonal influenza vaccine hesitancy at Public Health - Seattle & King County

dc.contributor.advisorEdwards, Kellyen_US
dc.contributor.authorSeymour, Matthewen_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-24T17:39:47Z
dc.date.available2015-02-24T17:39:47Z
dc.date.issued2015-02-24
dc.date.issued2015-02-24
dc.date.submitted2014en_US
dc.descriptionThesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2014en_US
dc.description.abstractUnlike healthcare workers, little research has been pursued to understand the reasons for declination of the seasonal influenza vaccine among clinical and non-clinical public health professionals. This research project aimed to describe the reasons for declination of the seasonal influenza vaccine as well as any motivating factors that might promote vaccination among a sample of 10 public health workers at Public Health - Seattle & King County. The results would inform possible areas for Public Health - Seattle & King County to target in order to increase their organizational rates of seasonal influenza vaccination. Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with each of the participants. The subsequent transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis [Hsieh & Shannon, 2005]; codes were developed from the research questions, interview guides, and the Health Belief Model. Participants declined for many reasons, including: lack of perceived susceptibility, lack of perceived benefits of vaccination, and concerns about the safety of the vaccine. Additionally, five categories of motivational factors emerged from the analysis: 1) evidence about influenza or seasonal influenza vaccine, 2) incentives to promote vaccination, 3) mandatory vaccination policies, 4) generalized risks of acquiring/transmitting seasonal influenza, and 5) personalized risks of acquiring/transmitting seasonal influenza. Measures adopted by Public Health - Seattle & King County that are perceived to be coercive may prompt some participants to reassert their anti-vaccination stance more firmly. Therefore, three areas were chosen for Public Health - Seattle & King County to target based on these results: 1) shifting perceptions away from influenza vaccination as a form of over-medication, 2) promoting vaccination as a way to benefit the common good, and 3) personalizing the risks of seasonal influenza. Pursuit of any or all of these recommendations hopefully will yield cost-effective interventions that can be utilized by Public Health - Seattle & King County to increase their organizational seasonal influenza vaccination rate.en_US
dc.embargo.termsOpen Accessen_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.otherSeymour_washington_0250O_13998.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/27577
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the individual authors.en_US
dc.subjectFlu vaccine; Influenza vaccine; Public health; Seasonal influenza; Vaccination; Vaccine hesitancyen_US
dc.subject.otherPublic healthen_US
dc.subject.otherBehavioral sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherHealth sciencesen_US
dc.subject.otherpublic health geneticsen_US
dc.titleGiving Vaccination a Shot: Describing seasonal influenza vaccine hesitancy at Public Health - Seattle & King Countyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Seymour_washington_0250O_13998.pdf
Size:
774.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format