Giving Vaccination a Shot: Describing seasonal influenza vaccine hesitancy at Public Health - Seattle & King County
| dc.contributor.advisor | Edwards, Kelly | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Seymour, Matthew | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-02-24T17:39:47Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-02-24T17:39:47Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-02-24 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015-02-24 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2014 | en_US |
| dc.description | Thesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2014 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Unlike healthcare workers, little research has been pursued to understand the reasons for declination of the seasonal influenza vaccine among clinical and non-clinical public health professionals. This research project aimed to describe the reasons for declination of the seasonal influenza vaccine as well as any motivating factors that might promote vaccination among a sample of 10 public health workers at Public Health - Seattle & King County. The results would inform possible areas for Public Health - Seattle & King County to target in order to increase their organizational rates of seasonal influenza vaccination. Qualitative, semi-structured interviews were conducted with each of the participants. The subsequent transcripts were analyzed using directed content analysis [Hsieh & Shannon, 2005]; codes were developed from the research questions, interview guides, and the Health Belief Model. Participants declined for many reasons, including: lack of perceived susceptibility, lack of perceived benefits of vaccination, and concerns about the safety of the vaccine. Additionally, five categories of motivational factors emerged from the analysis: 1) evidence about influenza or seasonal influenza vaccine, 2) incentives to promote vaccination, 3) mandatory vaccination policies, 4) generalized risks of acquiring/transmitting seasonal influenza, and 5) personalized risks of acquiring/transmitting seasonal influenza. Measures adopted by Public Health - Seattle & King County that are perceived to be coercive may prompt some participants to reassert their anti-vaccination stance more firmly. Therefore, three areas were chosen for Public Health - Seattle & King County to target based on these results: 1) shifting perceptions away from influenza vaccination as a form of over-medication, 2) promoting vaccination as a way to benefit the common good, and 3) personalizing the risks of seasonal influenza. Pursuit of any or all of these recommendations hopefully will yield cost-effective interventions that can be utilized by Public Health - Seattle & King County to increase their organizational seasonal influenza vaccination rate. | en_US |
| dc.embargo.terms | Open Access | en_US |
| dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | Seymour_washington_0250O_13998.pdf | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1773/27577 | |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.rights | Copyright is held by the individual authors. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Flu vaccine; Influenza vaccine; Public health; Seasonal influenza; Vaccination; Vaccine hesitancy | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Public health | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Behavioral sciences | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | Health sciences | en_US |
| dc.subject.other | public health genetics | en_US |
| dc.title | Giving Vaccination a Shot: Describing seasonal influenza vaccine hesitancy at Public Health - Seattle & King County | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
- Name:
- Seymour_washington_0250O_13998.pdf
- Size:
- 774.37 KB
- Format:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
