Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Use and Utility by Washington State Pharmacists: A Mixed Methods Study

dc.contributor.advisorStergachis, Andreas
dc.contributor.authorPett, Ryan
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-14T22:34:23Z
dc.date.available2019-08-14T22:34:23Z
dc.date.issued2019-08-14
dc.date.submitted2019
dc.descriptionThesis (Master's)--University of Washington, 2019
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To explore factors and situations that influence pharmacists to utilize the prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP) and to characterize actions taken by pharmacists following alarming scenarios from a PDMP query. Also, to explore the theory of planned behavior’s (TPB) utility, along with perceived obligation, in predicting pharmacists’ high intention to utilize the PDMP. Design: Explanatory sequential two-phase mixed methods design: (1) cross-sectional web-based survey of Washington State pharmacists followed by (2) interviews with purposefully selected respondents to explore significant quantitative findings. Setting: Washington State from September 2018 to February 2019. Participants: A total of 967 Washington State pharmacists from various practice settings, including inpatient and outpatient pharmacies. Ten outpatient pharmacists were interviewed in the second phase. Outcome measures: Pharmacist reported the frequency of PDMP use, opinion on the usefulness of PDMP, action(s) taken following a concerning PDMP report and a model to predict pharmacists’ high intention to utilize the PDMP by applying the TPB with the addition of perceived obligation. Results: The usable response rate for pharmacists with a PDMP account was 17.6% (818/4659) and for all pharmacists was 10.4% (967/9263). PDMP use varied by ethnicity, practice setting and employer policy on PDMP use. Among the 818 PDMP users, 396 (48%) utilized the database at least once during a shift. Frequent PDMP users were more likely to recommend naloxone compared to less frequent users (Adjusted odds ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.65; P = 0.02). The constructs of subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and perceived obligation significantly predicted pharmacists’ high intention to utilize the PDMP (P = <0.001). Conclusion: PDMP has value to pharmacists of all practice settings studied. Frequent PDMP use may facilitate more pharmacist-interventions, such as a naloxone prescription. Outreach, training and communications that address pharmacists’ subjective norms, perceived behavioral control and perceived obligation may be more likely to increase pharmacists’ high intention to utilize PDMP.
dc.embargo.termsOpen Access
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.otherPett_washington_0250O_19872.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1773/44317
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.haspartSupplement A - PDMP Survey Instrument.pdf; pdf; Supplement A - PDMP Survey Instrument.
dc.relation.haspartSupplement B - semi-structured telephone interview guide.pdf; pdf; Supplement B - semi-structured telephone interview guide.
dc.rightsCC BY
dc.subjectmixed methods
dc.subjectnaloxone
dc.subjectopioids
dc.subjectPharmacist
dc.subjectprescription drug monitoring program
dc.subjecttheory of planned behavior
dc.subjectPublic health
dc.subjectHealth sciences
dc.subjectMedicine
dc.subject.otherHealth services
dc.titlePrescription Drug Monitoring Program Use and Utility by Washington State Pharmacists: A Mixed Methods Study
dc.typeThesis

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Pett_washington_0250O_19872.pdf
Size:
1.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Supplement A - PDMP Survey Instrument.pdf
Size:
44.23 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Supplement B - semi-structured telephone interview guide.pdf
Size:
126.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections